QA and testing services
Testing that runson every commit, not before every launch
Automated suites in the pipeline, plus the manual exploratory work that catches what assertions never will. Quality as a continuous signal rather than a phase.
500+
Projects delivered
most under NDA
100+
Clients served
5 regions
5
Systems live
in production now
โ
Clutch rating
awaiting verified score
What we build
The work itself,component by component
Test strategy
What gets unit, integration, or end-to-end coverage โ decided deliberately, not by habit.
Automated suites
Fast unit and integration tests in CI, with end-to-end covering the critical paths.
Regression packs
Every fixed bug gets a test, so it cannot come back unnoticed.
Exploratory testing
Structured manual sessions against real devices and real data shapes.
Performance testing
Load profiles based on your actual traffic, with the breaking point identified.
Accessibility audits
Automated checks plus keyboard and screen-reader passes on core flows.
Why it matters
What changesonce it is running
Three things a buyer of this work should be able to hold us to.
Bugs caught early โ A failure in CI costs minutes; the same failure in production costs a day.
Deployments stop being scary โ A green suite is what makes shipping on a Friday a normal decision.
Known limits โ Load testing tells you where the system breaks before your traffic does.
Stack we use for this
- Playwright
- Vitest
- pytest
- k6
- GitHub Actions
- axe
How it runs
Four stages,and you can leave after any of them
Scope
We agree what the system does and what shipping means, in writing.
Build
Short cycles in your repository, running before it is finished.
Ship
Deployed into your cloud account, reachable by a real user.
Stay
Maintenance and roadmap by the same engineers who built it.
Proof
The systemsthat back this page
FAQ
Questionswe get asked
Can you add tests to an existing project?
Yes โ starting with the highest-risk paths rather than chasing a coverage number.
Do you do manual testing too?
Yes. Automation and exploratory testing catch different classes of defect.
What coverage should we target?
Coverage of the paths that lose money if they break, rather than a percentage.
QA and testing services